MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967678562 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2014.2299512

Sum-Rate Maximization in the Multicell MIMO Broadcast Channel With Interference Coordination

2014· article· en· W1967678562 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOPrecodingComputer scienceBase stationMathematical optimizationMaximizationDirty paper codingOptimization problemTelecommunications linkCellular networkInterference (communication)AlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)MathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the precoding designs to maximize the weighted sum-rate (WSR) in a multicell multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) broadcast channel (BC). We consider a multicell network under universal frequency reuse with multiple mobile stations (MS) per cell. With interference coordination (IC) between the multiple cells, the base-station (BS) at each cell only transmits information signals to the MSs within its cell using the dirty paper coding (DPC) technique, while coordinating the inter-cell interference (ICI) induced to other cells. The main focus of this work is to jointly optimize the encoding covariance matrices across the BSs in order to maximize the network-wide WSR. Since this optimization problem is shown to be nonconvex, obtaining its globally optimal solution is highly complicated. To address this problem, we consider two low-complexity solution approaches with distributed implementation to obtain at least locally optimal solutions. In the first approach, by applying a successive convex approximation technique, the original nonconvex problem is decomposed into a sequence of simpler problems, which can be solved optimally and separately at each BS. In the second approach, the WSR problem is solved via an equivalent problem of weighted sum mean squared error minimization. Both solution approaches will unfold the control signaling among the coordinated BSs to allow their distributed implementation. Simulation results confirm the convergence of the proposed algorithms, as well as their superior performances over schemes with linear precoding or no interference coordination among the BSs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it