Hydrogen sulfide treatment improves long-term renal dysfunction resulting from prolonged warm renal ischemia-reperfusion injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) continues to rise concurrently with the increased prevalence of end-stage renal disease worldwide. Treatment for small renal masses continues to be partial nephrectomy mostly involving the clamping of renal blood vessels. Although necessary, this technique results in warm renal ischemia and reperfusion injury (IRI) to the afflicted kidney. We have recently demonstrated that hydrogen sulfide (H2S), a novel endogenous gaseous molecule, protects against prolonged cold and short-term warm renal IRI. In the current study, we examined whether exogenous H2S has long-term protective effects against warm renal IRI associated with renal surgical procedures. METHODS: Uni-nephrectomized Lewis rats underwent 1 hour of warm ischemia induced by clamping of the renal pelvis. Animals underwent either intraperitoneal treatment with phosphate buffered saline (PBS; IRI group) or PBS supplemented with 150 μM NaHS (H2S group), and were compared against Sham-operated rats. RESULTS: H2S treatment improved long-term renal function as serum creatinine at day 7 was significantly decreased in the H2S group compared to IRI animals (p < 0.05). H2S treatment decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory markers TLR-4, TNF-α, IFNγ, IL-2 and ICAM-1, increased the expression of pro-survival molecule Bcl-2 and decreased the expression of pro-apoptotic marker BID at postoperative day 1. H2S-treated kidneys also showed a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in infiltration of macrophages at day 7 post-IRI compared to no treatment. CONCLUSION: H2S treatment improved long-term renal function and decreased long-term inflammation associated with warm IRI, and may offer a novel therapeutic approach to preventing warm IRI-induced renal injury associated with renal surgical procedures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".