MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967685295 · doi:10.1149/05021.0009ecst

The Electrochemical Atomic Layer Deposition of Pt and Pd Nanoparticles on Ni Foam for the Electro-Oxidation of Alcohols

2013· article· en· W1967685295 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsCanadian Society of Intestinal Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrochemistryMaterials scienceScanning electron microscopeRedoxCarbon fibersElectrodeLayer (electronics)Deposition (geology)MethanolMetalCrystalliteChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryCarbon nanofoamChemistryMetallurgyNanotechnologyComposite materialOrganic chemistryComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrodeposition of Pt and Pd metal by surface limited redox replacement reactions was performed using the electrochemical atomic layer deposition. Carbon paper and Ni foam were used as substrates for metal deposition. Supported Pt and Pd electrodes were characterised using electrochemical methods and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Cyclic voltammograms of the electrodeposited Pt and Pd on substrates showed features characteristic of polycrystalline Pt and Pd electrodes respectively. Ethanol oxidation in alkaline media was highly favoured on Pd/Ni foam than on Carbon paper while methanol oxidation was favoured more on Carbon paper than on Ni foam. Carbon paper and Ni foam produced good quality deposits and the EDX confirmed the presence of Pt and Pd particles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it