MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967690381 · doi:10.1139/o07-153

Approaches to the discovery of new antibacterial agents based on bacteriocinsThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled CSBMCB — Systems and Chemical Biology, and has undergone the Journal's usual peer review process.

2008· review· en· W1967690381 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Clarissa S. Sit, John C. Vederas

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProbiotics and Fermented Foods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBacteriocinAntimicrobialComputational biologyBacteriaBiologySelection (genetic algorithm)Antimicrobial peptidesDrug discoveryAntibiotic resistanceBiotechnologyMicrobiologyComputer scienceBiochemistryGeneticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic bacteria has led to a search for novel classes of antimicrobial drugs. Bacteriocins are peptides that are naturally produced by bacteria and have considerable potential to fulfill the need for more effective bacteriocidal agents. In this mini-review, we describe research aimed at generating analogues of bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria, with the goal of gaining a better understanding of structure-activity relationships in these peptides. In particular, we report recent findings on synthetic analogues of leucocin A, pediocin PA1, and lacticin 3147 A2, as well as on the significance of these results for the design and production of new antibiotics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicProbiotics and Fermented FoodsFrench-language works237,207