MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967762628 · doi:10.1021/ed077p670.2

Why Does the Middle Band in the Absorption Spectrum of Ni(H2O)6 2+ Have Two Maxima?

2000· article· en· W1967762628 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Education · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaximaAbsorption (acoustics)Absorption spectroscopyElectromagnetic spectrumSpectrum (functional analysis)Materials scienceEngineering physicsNanotechnologyOpticsPhysicsChemistryQuantum mechanicsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The band shape observed for the 3 A 2g --> 3 T 1g ( 3 F ), 1 E g crystal field transitions ( 1 ) in the UV-NIR absorption spectrum of Ni(H 2 O) 6 2+ is analyzed with a time-dependent theoretical model and visualized in this electronic publication. The importance of fast intersystem crossings is illustrated by our animations, as is the influence of the positions of the excited-state potential energy surfaces, along both the energy and the normal coordinate axes ( 2 ). The model quantitatively reproduces the experimental spectrum between 550 and 900 nm and illustrates the important symmetry and bonding information that can be obtained from electronic spectra of transition metal compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it