MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967773459 · doi:10.1002/jhet.326

On the purity of 2‐[<i>ortho</i>‐anilinyl]‐1,3‐benzoxazole derived from 2<i>H</i>‐3,1‐benzoxazine‐2,4(1<i>H</i>)dione (<i>isatoic anhydride</i>) [1,2]

2010· article· en· W1967773459 on OpenAlexaff
Karen M. Button, Robert A. Gossage, Hilary A. Jenkins, Tayseer Mahdi, Sanja Resanović

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Heterocyclic Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhenothiazines and Benzothiazines Synthesis and Activities
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityToronto Metropolitan UniversityAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenzoxazoleChemistryOrthorhombic crystal systemMoleculeCrystal structureLewis acids and basesCrystallographyCrystal (programming language)StereochemistryMedicinal chemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract magnified image The Lewis acid catalyzed synthesis and chromatographic purification of isatoic anhydride‐derived 2‐(2′‐anilinyl)‐1,3‐benzoxazole (2) can result in the co‐isolation of 2 and a light pink colored impurity (<5%). This latter species has been identified (NMR, single crystal X‐ray diffraction, mp) as 2′‐hydroxy‐2‐aminobenzanilide (3), which represents a predictable intermediate in the formation of 2. Compound 3 crystallizes in an orthorhombic crystal system of space group P212121 with four molecules in the unit cell (α = β = γ = 90°; a = 6.715 (2) Å, b = 12.100 (4) Å, c = 13.321 (4) Å; V = 1082.2 (6) Å3). Pure 2 is characterized as a colorless, high‐melting solid; unlike the dark colored oil that is isolated if 2 contains traces of 3. J. Heterocyclic Chem., (2010).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Heterocyclic ChemistrySame topicPhenothiazines and Benzothiazines Synthesis and ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207