MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967802283 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564794

Distributed video coding and transmission over wireless fading channel

2008· article· en· W1967802283 on OpenAlexaffvenue
T. Kuganeswaran, Xavier Fernando, Ling Guan

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCodecComputer scienceAdditive white Gaussian noiseFadingEncoderDecoding methodsWirelessCoding (social sciences)Channel (broadcasting)Real-time computingComputer networkAlgorithmTelecommunicationsMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed video coding (DVC) has been featured by exploiting the video statistics, partially or totally at the decoder. Wireless sensor networks are supposed to have lesser complexity encoders at the expense of higher decoder complexity. Therefore DVC is more suitable to video transmission over wireless sensor networks compared to conventional video coding. Current research work on DVC is conducted for lossless channel, i.e, parity bit stream is not influenced by noise or distortion and further correlation noise due to the residual between input video frame and side information is not estimated effectively. In other words , noisy environment is not analyzed with DVC codec in recent research works. In this paper, DVC codec is enabled with the effect of AWGN noise and further a single wireless fading channel (SISO) is considered. The correlation noise is analyzed for Foreman and Carphone video sequences and relationship of correlation of adjacent key frames are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207