MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967802283 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564794

Distributed video coding and transmission over wireless fading channel

2008· article· en· W1967802283 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCodecComputer scienceAdditive white Gaussian noiseFadingEncoderDecoding methodsWirelessCoding (social sciences)Channel (broadcasting)Real-time computingComputer networkAlgorithmTelecommunicationsMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed video coding (DVC) has been featured by exploiting the video statistics, partially or totally at the decoder. Wireless sensor networks are supposed to have lesser complexity encoders at the expense of higher decoder complexity. Therefore DVC is more suitable to video transmission over wireless sensor networks compared to conventional video coding. Current research work on DVC is conducted for lossless channel, i.e, parity bit stream is not influenced by noise or distortion and further correlation noise due to the residual between input video frame and side information is not estimated effectively. In other words , noisy environment is not analyzed with DVC codec in recent research works. In this paper, DVC codec is enabled with the effect of AWGN noise and further a single wireless fading channel (SISO) is considered. The correlation noise is analyzed for Foreman and Carphone video sequences and relationship of correlation of adjacent key frames are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it