Correlation of endothelial function in large and small arteries in human essential hypertension.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The structure and function of blood vessels varies along the vascular tree, and alterations found in hypertension are also different. The aim of this study was to determine whether non-invasive measurement of endothelial function in conduit arteries reflects that of subcutaneous resistance arteries measured in vitro. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixteen essential hypertensive patients (aged 50 +/- 2 years) were studied. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) during reactive hyperemia (endothelium-dependent) and sublingual nitroglycerin (NTG)-induced dilatation (endothelium-independent) were assessed in brachial arteries by ultrasound. Structure, and acetylcholine (10(-9) to 10(-4) mol/l) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 10(-8) to 10(-3) mol/l)-induced vasorelaxation of resistance arteries dissected from gluteal subcutaneous biopsies were measured in vitro using a pressurized myograph. Brachial artery FMD and NTG-induced dilatation were 8.4 +/- 1.0 and 18.1 +/- 1.4%, respectively. Resistance arteries of hypertensive patients showed greater media:lumen ratio (8.6 +/- 0.4 versus 5.9 +/- 0.3% in normotensive subjects, P< 0.01), and maximal acetylcholine responses was diminished to 75 +/- 6% compared to normotensive subjects (97 +/- 2%, P< 0.01). FMD correlated with maximal acetylcholine responses (r2 = 0.57, P< 0.001). FMD did not correlate significantly with the media: lumen ratio of resistance arteries (r2 = -0.22, P= 0.07). By multivariate analysis, FMD predicted resistance artery endothelial function independently of age, sex, body mass index, blood lipid status and lumen diameter of brachial artery (beta = 0.81, P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial dilatory responses are similar in large and small arteries in hypertensive patients. Abnormal FMD in the brachial artery predicts the presence of endothelial dysfunction in human resistance arteries, suggesting that impairment of endothelial function is a generalized alteration in hypertension. Ultrasound measurement of endothelial dysfunction in the brachial artery appears to be less sensitive than in-vitro measurement in resistance arteries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".