MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967842342 · doi:10.1103/physreve.80.031603

Quantized liquid density-functional theory for hydrogen adsorption in nanoporous materials

2009· article· en· W1967842342 on OpenAlexaff
Serguei Patchkovskii, Thomas Heine

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDensity functional theoryPhysicsQuantumGrand potentialBoltzmann constantClassical fluidsNanoporousLocal-density approximationStatistical physicsQuantum mechanicsMaterials scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a finite-temperature quantized version of density-functional theory of atomic and molecular liquids (QLDFT). Following the Kohn-Sham partitioning of the free energy, we introduce a noninteracting reference fluid of particles obeying the Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics. The kinetic and potential energy of the reference fluid are evaluated exactly. All remaining contributions, including interactions between fluid particles and corrections due to the appropriate quantum statistics are subsumed by an excess (in electronic DFT called exchange-correlation) functional. Two variants to approximate the excess functional are presented: the simplest local-interaction expression (LIE-0) avoids the direct calculation of interparticle interactions and includes them in the excess functional, which is parametrized to reproduce experimental equation of state of normal hydrogen. The more sophisticated LIE-1 approximation is based on the weighted local-density approximation and includes the explicit interparticle interaction potential as well as the local approximation of the excess functional, the latter being weighted by the average over a spherical environment to include nonlocal effects in an approximate way. We apply LIE-0 and LIE-1 to two benchmark systems, bulk fluid hydrogen and hydrogen in a slit pore, and compare it with classical molecular-dynamics simulations employing the same potential. Both functionals produce similar results for direct quantum effects in adsorption free energy. At the same time, LIE-1 also yields a reasonable description of the fluid structure and classical packing effects, which are not reproduced by LIE-0. The source code of our implementation of the LIE-QLDFT is distributed under the GNU public license and is included as a supporting material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207