Acetylacetonato(phosphane)iridium Complexes: Synthesis and Catalytic Activity in the Cyclization of Alkynoic Acids
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The iridium complex [Ir(acac)(η 2 ‐coe) 2 ] ( 1 ) has been easily prepared by the addition of Tl(acac) to a suspension of [Ir(μ‐Cl)(η 2 ‐coe) 2 ] 2 in hexane. Complex 1 has been characterized fully including an X‐ray diffraction study. It is moderately stable and is a useful precursor to a number of different acetylacetonato(phosphane)iridium complexes via addition of monodentate and bidentate phosphanes. Reactions proceeded at room temperature to give high yields of the desired square planar phosphane complexes [Ir(acac)(P)] ( 2 : P = 2 PPh 3 , 3 : P = 2 PMePh 2 , 4 : P = dppm, 5 : P = dppe, 6 : P = dppp, 7 : P = dppb, 8 : P = dppf, 9 : P = dcpe) except for those involving dppe, which gave a complicated mixture of products. Complex [Ir(acac)(dppe)] ( 5 ) was prepared in a microwave reactor at 125 °C. All complexes prepared in this study were efficient in the intramolecular catalyzed cyclization of4‐pentynoic acid to give exclusive formation of the exocyclic γ‐methylene‐γ‐butyrolactone. Complex 1 was found to be the most active and selective catalyst precursor for the intramolecular cyclization of both 4‐pentynoic acid and 5‐hexynoic acid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it