MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967869899 · doi:10.1167/iovs.09-3614

Normative Measurements of the Chinese Extraocular Musculature by High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2010· article· en· W1967869899 on OpenAlexaff
Sunny Shen, Kee Siew Fong, Hwee Bee Wong, Audrey Looi, Ling Ling Chan, Jack Rootman, Lay Leng Seah

Bibliographic record

VenueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingExtraocular musclesCoronal planeNuclear medicineAnatomyMedicineMaterials scienceRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To establish the normal measurements of diameter and cross-sectional area of the Chinese extraocular muscles (EOMs) and optic nerve-sheath complex (ON) as seen on high-field (3-Tesla; 3T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Coronal 3T MRI of the orbit (TR, 700 ms; TE, 15 ms; FOV, 160 mm; matrix, 256 x 256; slice thickness, 1 mm; and slice gap, 0) was performed on 80 normal Chinese volunteers. T1-weighted images were analyzed with computer-assisted segmentation. The diameter and the cross-sectional area of EOMs and the ON were measured from the image plane at the posterior aspect of the globe and at 7 mm behind the globe. The maximum diameter of EOM was measured from their respective reconstructed images. RESULTS: The normal measurement (mean +/- SD) of diameter at the posterior aspect of the globe: medial rectus (MR), 3.6 +/- 0.4 mm; inferior rectus (IR), 3.7 +/- 0.8 mm; lateral rectus (LR), 2.3 +/- 0.5 mm; superior oblique (SO), 2.4 +/- 0.6 mm; and the ON, 5.4 +/- 0.7 mm. The normal measurement of diameter 7 mm behind the globe: MR, 3.2 +/- 0.6 mm; IR, 3.9 +/- 0.8 mm; LR, 4.0 +/- 0.8 mm; SO, 2.2 +/- 0.7 mm; and ON, 4.2 +/- 0.5 mm. The normal measurement of cross-sectional area at the posterior aspect of the globe: superior muscle group (SMG), 28.2 +/- 6.5 mm(2); MR, 25.5 +/- 3.2 mm(2); IR, 26.9 +/- 7.2 mm(2); LR, 17.3 +/- 3.9 mm(2); SO, 10.5 +/- 3.5 mm(2); and ON, 27.6 +/- 6.1 mm(2). The normal measurement of cross-sectional area 7 mm behind the globe: SMG, 24.1 +/- 6.6 mm(2); MR, 19.1 +/- 4.6 mm(2); IR, 29.5 +/- 6.6 mm(2); LR, 32.3 +/- 6.5 mm(2); SO, 9.7 +/- 3.9 mm(2); and ON, 17.1 +/- 2.9 mm(2). The normal measurement of maximum diameter: SMG, 4.8 +/- 1.1 mm; MR, 5.1 +/- 0.9 mm; IR, 5.4 +/- 1.0 mm; and LR, 4.5 +/- 0.9 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese 3T MRI EOMs and ON normative data may be useful in determining pathologic enlargement of the EOMs and ON in various orbital conditions. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00348413.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual ScienceSame topicOphthalmology and Eye DisordersFrench-language works237,207