Stress–strain behaviour of weathered weak rock in middle-sized triaxial tests
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A middle-sized triaxial test apparatus for a specimen 20 cm in height and 10 cm in diameter was developed to measure the deformation and strength of weak rock or gravel. High-quality undisturbed samples of a weathered weak rock were taken from a dam site by a core drilling method. To avoid damage to the structure of the weak rock due to saturation of specimens as a result of measuring volume change through the water change in a burette, the lateral deformation of specimens was directly measured in the unsaturated condition using three rings mounted on the specimen. Using the developed triaxial test apparatus, isotropic compression tests and consolidated–drained triaxial compression tests were performed on unsaturated or saturated undisturbed samples under confining pressures of 49, 98, 196, 392, 539, and 683 kPa. The test results show that the stress–strain relationship of the weathered weak rock under both unsaturated and saturated conditions is strongly influenced by the confining pressure when the confining pressure is less than 392 kPa, and the stress–strain behaviour becomes similar to that of normally consolidated clay when the confining pressure is greater than 392 kPa. Comparison of results of triaxial tests on unsaturated and saturated specimens shows that the saturated samples become somewhat weak. The test results also show that the bonding and stress history largely influence the stress–strain relationship at small strain levels.Key words: weathered weak rock, microstructure, undisturbed sample, deformation, strength, triaxial test, unsaturated sample.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".