The C-terminal Domain of the Nucleotide-binding Domain Protein Wzt Determines Substrate Specificity in the ATP-binding Cassette Transporter for the Lipopolysaccharide O-antigens in Escherichia coli Serotypes O8 and O9a
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The polymannan O-antigenic polysaccharides (O-PSs) of Escherichia coli O8 and O9a are synthesized via an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter-dependent pathway. The group 2 capsular polysaccharides of E. coli serve as prototypes for polysaccharide synthesis and export via this pathway. Here, we show that there are some fundamental differences between the ABC transporter-dependent pathway for O-PS biosynthesis and the capsular polysaccharide paradigm. In the capsule system, mutants lacking the ABC transporter are viable, and membranes isolated from these strains are no longer able to synthesize polymer using an endogenous acceptor. In contrast, E. coli strains carrying mutations in the membrane component (Wzm) and/or the nucleotide-binding component (Wzt) of the O8 and O9a polymannan transporters are nonviable under conditions permissive to O-PS biosynthesis and take on an aberrant elongated cell morphology. Whereas the ABC transporters for capsular polysaccharides with different structures are functionally interchangeable, the O8 and O9a exporters are specific for their cognate polymannan substrates. The E. coli O8 and O9a Wzt proteins contain a C-terminal domain not present in the corresponding nucleotide-binding protein (KpsT) from the capsule exporter. Whereas the Wzm components are functionally interchangeable, albeit with reduced efficiency, the Wzt components are not, indicating a specific role for Wzt in substrate specificity. Chimeric Wzt proteins were constructed in order to localize the region involved in substrate specificity to the C-terminal domain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".