MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967945726 · doi:10.2118/0313-0128-jpt

Identification and Prediction of Wells Susceptible to Sulfide Stress Cracking

2013· article· en· W1967945726 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adam Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasingPetroleum engineeringAsphaltHydrogen sulfideCrackingSteam injectionGeologyEnvironmental scienceForensic engineeringSulfurEngineeringMaterials scienceMetallurgyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article, written by Editorial Manager Adam Wilson, contains highlights of paper SPE 160489, ’Identification of SSC (Sulfide-Stress-Cracking) -Susceptible Wells and Risk Prediction,’ by Tapan Chakrabarty and Richard J. Smith, Imperial Oil Resources, prepared for the 2012 SPE Heavy Oil Conference Canada, Calgary, 12-14 June. The paper has not been peer reviewed. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) generated by aquathermolysis—a high-temperature reaction of condensed steam (water) with sulfur-bearing bitumen in the reservoir rock—may increase the risk of sulfide stress cracking (SSC) in cyclic-steam-stimulation (CSS) wells. Identifying the SSC-susceptible wells is important in terms of reducing SSC risk by allocating resources to and implementing proactive intervention measures at the SSC-susceptible wells. A comprehensive research program, with a dedicated instrumented CSS well as the centerpiece, has been undertaken with the objectives of characterizing H2S evolution in the wellbore and developing a tool for identifying the SSC-susceptible wells. Introduction Imperial Oil is using CSS commercially to recover bitumen from the Clearwater formation at the Cold Lake field in Alberta, Canada. In this process, the reservoir is stimulated by injecting high-pressure/high-temperature steam to reduce the bitumen viscosity and produce the thinned bitumen through the same well in a cyclical manner. In a given well, steam injection is through the casing, liquid (bitumen and condensed steam) production is through the tubing, and gas production is mainly through the casing annulus. It is the casing that is susceptible to SSC, as shown in a small casing section retrieved from a Cold Lake CSS well (Fig. 1). SSC in a CSS well is induced by H2S that is generated by the reaction, termed aquathermolysis, between condensed steam and sulfur-bearing bitumen. SSC increases with an increase in H2S partial pressure (pH2S) and with a decrease in well temperature. The inverse temperature effect is attributed to the diffusion of hydrogen atoms—a product of the reaction between H2S and iron—through the casing metal matrix. At a lower temperature, the hydro-gen diffusion is slower and the hydrogen accumulation inside the casing wall is higher, leading to a higher stress build-up and an increased SSC susceptibility. To reduce the risk of SSC in CSS wells at Cold Lake, Imperial Oil has implemented an extensive casing-integrity-assurance program that includes Measuring the H2S during production in all the wells as they cool down to lower than 70°C Shutting in an SSC-susceptible well Purging the casing annulus of a shut-in well with nitrogen to lower the H2S level in the wellbore

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207