Testing Relationships among Determinants of Health, Health Policy, and Self-Assessed Health Status in Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By removing financial barriers, the Canada Health Act (1984) equalized access to health care services in Canada. Yet class, educational, and geographical disparities in individual and population health status persist. Recent health reform policies in Quebec assert that health and well-being are a function of income, educational level, housing conditions, employment, and other socioeconomic factors. They suggest that health policy should encompass social policies that influence individual and community socioeconomic factors which in turn affect health. Against the backdrop of these reforms, this study tests the importance of socioeconomic factors as a determinant of health--while controlling for other known determinants through a logistic regression model--with data from the Santé Quebec health surveys 1987 and 1992-93. The results confirm the importance of economic security as a determinant of individual health. This effect appears to operate through an individual income variable and through the community-level variable of regional unemployment. The importance of the income effect declined between 1987 and 1992-93. This may indicate that an increased focus on the socioeconomic determinants of health has reduced inequalities in health. It may also mean that health inequalities appear inevitable until health care policy merges completely with broader health and social policies. But such integration may well conflict with economic (and political) imperatives of the post-Fordist capitalist system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes | Observational | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes | Observational | medium |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".