MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967968598 · doi:10.2118/131265-pa

Thermomagnetic Analyses of the Permeability-Controlling Minerals in Red and White Sandstones in Deep Tight Gas Reservoirs: Implications for Downhole Measurements

2011· article· en· W1967968598 on OpenAlexafffund
Arfan Ali, David K. Potter

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of EdinburghHeriot-Watt University
KeywordsGeologyMineralogyPermeability (electromagnetism)Tight gasIlliteHematiteClastic rockCarbonate mineralsClay mineralsCarbonateHydraulic fracturingGeochemistryPetroleum engineeringChemistrySedimentary rockDolomite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Our recent work on deep tight gas reservoirs containing red and white sandstones (Potter et al. 2009) has suggested that the presence of small amounts of hematite in reservoir samples can have a dramatic effect on permeability. Such conclusions were made using laboratory-based low- and high-field magnetic-susceptibility measurements on reservoir-rock samples and by comparing these measurements with the permeability data. These rapid, nondestructive magnetic measurements have been applied previously in clastic reservoir samples (Potter 2007; (Ivakhnenko 2006; Ivakhnenko and Potter 2008; Potter and Ivakhnenko 2008) and carbonate reservoir samples (Al-Ghamdi 2006; Potter et al. 2011). However, such laboratory-based analyses are not representative of the downhole in-situ conditions, especially in deep gas reservoirs where the temperature can reach quite high values. Typical tight-gas-reservoir depths can reach approximately 4000 m (Abu-Shanab et al. 2005) and 6000 m (Tang et al. 2008), and the equivalent temperatures would measure 131 and 192°C, respectively, if one assumes the normal geothermal gradient (Mayer-Gurr 1976). This paper investigates the in-situ magnetic properties of deep tight gas reservoir samples (containing permeability-controlling reservoir minerals hematite and illite) by means of laboratory experiments to model downhole temperature conditions. We perform magnetic hysteresis measurements at various temperatures in order to identify and quantify mineralogy and model changes in the magnetic behavior of these minerals at in-situ downhole conditions. From these measurements, we are able to show whether the mineralogy or domain state of the permeability-controlling minerals is likely to change with temperature in deep gas reservoirs. These changes can potentially have a major effect on permeability. We also demonstrate that there are strong correlations between core-permeability and magnetic-susceptibility data in these tight-gas-reservoir samples. The permeability is low in red sections of the core wherever there is hematite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Reservoir Evaluation & EngineeringSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207