MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967972929 · doi:10.1002/aoc.628

Flash vacuum thermolysis of 3,4‐dimethyl‐1‐germacyclopent‐3‐enes: UV photoelectron spectroscopic characterization of GeH<sub>2</sub> and GeMe<sub>2</sub>

2004· article· en· W1967972929 on OpenAlexafffund
Virginie Lemierre, Anna Chrostowska, Alain Dargelos, Patrick Baylère, William J. Leigh, Cameron R. Harrington

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Organometallic Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyThermal decompositionChemistryIonization energyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Flash (photography)DecompositionIonizationDensity functional theoryPhotoemission spectroscopySpectral linePhysical chemistryComputational chemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceOrganic chemistryPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gas‐phase UV photoelectron spectra of germylene (GeH 2 ) and its dimethyl analogue (GeMe 2 ) have been recorded, using flash vacuum thermolysis of 3,4‐dimethyl‐ and 1,1,3,4‐tetramethyl‐germacyclopent‐3‐ene to generate these reactive species in the inlet of the photoelectron spectrometer. The lowest vertical ionization bands for GeH 2 (9.4 eV) and GeMe 2 (8.2 and 10.0 eV) have been located with the aid of time‐dependent density functional theory calculations carried out at the B3LYP/6‐311G(d,p) level of theory. Similar experiments carried out with 3,4‐dimethyl‐1,1‐diphenylgermacyclopent‐3‐ene, in an attempt to record the photoelectron spectrum of diphenylgermylene (GePh 2 ), were less conclusive, but are consistent with the theoretically predicted lowest lonization potential of 8.0–8.2 eV for GePh 2 . Photoelectron spectra of the three germacyclopentene derivatives are also reported. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Organometallic ChemistrySame topicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compoundsFrench-language works237,207