Properties of uniaxially stretched polypropylene films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Polypropylene (PP) films have been prepared through two different cast extrusion processes: one using a machine direction orientation (MDO) unit and the other stretching the films at the die under high cooling conditions (lab unit). Films for two PP resins different in molecular structure have been prepared using both processing techniques. The effect of the resin structure and the processing conditions on the film properties has been examined. It was found that the MDO unit generated a highly oriented fibrillar crystalline structure with a distribution of elongated thick fibrils while extrusion under high cooling conditions generated an oriented row nucleated lamellar structure. The films showed distinctive tensile responses in stretching, with a strong solid‐elastic response for the oriented MDO films and a steady strain hardening after yielding for the sample obtained from lab unit cast extrusion. It was found that the strength in the transverse direction (TD) was particularly very low for the oriented MDO films made of the bimodal PP. The oxygen permeability was reduced with increasing draw ratio (DR) for the MDO films. The haze property for the MDO samples reduced to a plateau for DR up to 5 while clarity improved continuously with DR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".