MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Non-Hodgkin???s Lymphoma and Exposure to Benzene in a Multinational Cohort of More Than 308,000 Petroleum Workers, 1937 to 1996

2000· review· en· W1968004424 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Otto Wong, Gerhard K. Raabe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCohortConfidence intervalStandardized mortality ratioCohort studyOil refineryDemographyEnvironmental healthInternal medicineWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Petroleum workers are exposed to benzene or benzene-containing petroleum products. As such, studies of these workers provide an opportunity for investigating the relationship between benzene and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). However, few cohort studies of petroleum workers report results of NHL separately. One reason is that NHL is usually grouped with other lymphopoietic cancers in the analysis. Another reason is the relatively small number of NHL cases in some studies. To determine the risk of NHL in petroleum workers, we identified 26 cohorts of petroleum workers in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Italy, and Finland. Authors of the original studies were contacted, and data on the number of observed deaths and person-years of observation were requested. Data from these studies were reviewed individually as well as combined in a pooled analysis (meta-analysis). In particular, results for individual cohorts, most of which had never been reported before, were presented. The combined multinational cohort consisted of more than 308,000 petroleum workers (6.6 million person-years), and the observation period covered an interval of 60 years from 1937 to 1996. A total of 506 NHL deaths were observed, compared with 561.68 expected. The standardized mortality ratio was 0.90 and the 95% confidence interval was 0.82 to 0.98. Analyses were performed by type of facility and industrial process. Stratum-specific standardized mortality ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 0.96 (0.86 to 1.07) for US refinery workers, 1.12 (0.90 to 1.37) for non-US refinery workers, 0.64 (0.50 to 0.82) for product (gasoline) distribution workers, and 0.68 (0.47 to 0.95) for crude oil workers. When individual cohorts were stratified by length of observation, no pattern was detected. In general, exposure levels before 1950 were much higher than thereafter. However, analysis of workers by hire date (< 1950, > or = 1950) revealed no difference in NHL mortality. Furthermore, none of the individual studies showed significant exposure-response relations. In summary, results from individual studies, as well as from the pooled analysis, indicated that petroleum workers were not at an increased risk of NHL as a result of their exposure to benzene or other benzene-containing petroleum products in their work environment. This conclusion was supported by cohort studies of workers in other industries who were exposed to benzene as well as by population-based case-control studies of NHL and occupational exposures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Occupational and Environmental MedicineSame topicCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentFrench-language works237,207