MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ion-pair HPLC determination of hydroxycinnamic acid monoconjugates of putrescine, spermidine and spermine

2000· article· en· W1968026676 on OpenAlexafffund
Candace Panagabko, Deborah Chenier, Solomon Fixon-Owoo, Jeffrey Atkinson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytochemical Analysis · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPolyamine Metabolism and Applications
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryPutrescineSpermidineHydroxycinnamic acidSpermineChromatographyReagentPolyamineExtraction (chemistry)High-performance liquid chromatographyMethanolSolid phase extractionSodiumOrganic chemistryBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The terminal hydroxycinnamic acid monoconjugates of putrescine, spermidine and spermine were resolved and quantified in extracts of plant tissues using sodium hexanesulphonate as an ion-pair reagent and a double methanol gradient. Extracts were prepared from acidic methanol:water (80:20) that had been back-extracted with hexane, and fractionated on C-18 solid phase extraction and carboxymethyl cation exchange cartridges. The chromatographic conditions were capable of separating N1- and N8-coumaroyl and feruloyl spermidine, which differ only by the disposition of the secondary amine in the polyamine side chain. Reliable detection limits for most compounds were less than 5 µg/mL (approximately 10−5 M in the plant extract) and extraction efficiencies were 91% as determined using the novel internal standard, N1-coumaroyl hexanediamine. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytochemical AnalysisSame topicPolyamine Metabolism and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207