Les principaux intervenants dans l’évolution du système hospitalier en Mauricie, 1889-1939
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le système hospitalier au Québec durant la première moitié du XXe siècle est souvent perçu comme relativement stationnaire du point de vue de l'organisation et des rapports de pouvoir entre les principaux intervenants. C'est là une image que nous avons voulu remettre en question, notamment en montrant que le clergé francophone, propriétaire ou gérant de la plupart des grands établissements, dut tenir compte non seulement des pressions des médecins desservants, dont le prestige et l'influence croissaient rapidement, mais aussi de l'entrée en scène dans ce champ d'activité de deux acteurs puissants : la grande entreprise et l'État. Afin d'atteindre cet objectif, nous avons effectué une étude de l'évolution des services hospitaliers dans deux villes québécoises, Trois-Rivières et Shawinigan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".