Influence of Abradable Coating Wear Mechanical Properties on Rotor Stator Interaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the field of turbomachines, better engine performances are achieved by reducing possible parasitic leakage flows through the closure of the clearance distance between blade tips and surrounding casings. Accordingly, direct contact is now commonly accepted as part of aircraft engines everyday life. In order to avoid possibly catastrophic scenarii due to high contact forces between the rotating and static components, implementation of abradable coatings has been widely recognized as a robust solution offering several advantages: reducing potential damage to the incurring blade as well as adjusting operating clearances, in-situ, to accept physical contact events. In the present work, macroscopic behavior of the abradable coating is numerically approximated through a piecewise linear plastic constitutive law which allows for real time access to the current abradable layer profile. Contact simulations are carried out considering a three-dimensional industrial finite element model of a blade from a compressor stage and its surrounding casing, assumed perfectly rigid. Due to the large number of degrees of freedom, component mode synthesis methods are used. Simulations are repetitively carried-out over a wide rotational velocity range, and a large number of distinct values for two mechanical parameters of the abradable material are considered. Results show that the amplitude of vibration is highly sensitive to the Young modulus and the plastic modulus of the abradable and that a local maximum is detected. Also, a more realistic description of the contact forces allowing for a contribution in the tangential direction is suggested.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".