MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968062548 · doi:10.1016/0967-0653(95)91482-j

10.1016/0967-0653(95)91482-j

2000· article· en· W1968062548 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotic zonePhytoplanktonMicrobial food webEnvironmental scienceNutrientBiomass (ecology)Stratification (seeds)Dissolved organic carbonMicrobial loopEnvironmental chemistryFood webBiological pumpRemineralisationMediterranean seaCarbon cycleEcologyMediterranean climateChemistryBiologyEcosystemBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In light of evidence suggesting that both phytoplankton and bacteria in the Mediterranean Sea are limited by the availability of phosphorus rather than of nitrogen, and that most of the P in the photic zone during summer stratification exists as dissolved organic compounds (DOP), we address the question of how these observations may interact with the 'biological pump' transporting carbon to deep waters. From theoretical considerations, the C storage via sinking particles should function better in a P- than in an N-limited system. It is argued, however, that the microbial food web during summer stratification has a net accumulation of dissolved organic carbon (DOG) and DOP. The limited data available suggest a high DOC:DOP value which would make downwards transport of DOC with winter deep water formation a potentially effective mechanism in C sequestration from the atmosphere. Part of the DOC accumulating in the photic zone appears to be readily biodegradable. This is in conflict with a simple model of phytoplankton-bacterial competition for phosphate since phytoplankton, as an inferior competitor, would be expected to be reduced in biomass until autochthonous production of organic C falls to a level where bacteria become C-limited. The conflict is resolved by including microzooplankton grazing as a controlling factor of bacterial biomass.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0090.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9910.992

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.145
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations211
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207