MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968062782 · doi:10.1063/1.2217746

Structural implications of ring shape, dimension, and metal atom insertion in nanosized cyclic oligothiophenes: Joint Raman and density functional theory study

2006· article· en· W1968062782 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Casado, Marek Z. Zgierski, Gerda Fuhrmann, Peter Bäuerle, Juan T. López Navarrete

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
FundersJunta de AndalucíaMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadUniversidad de Málaga
KeywordsRaman spectroscopyRing (chemistry)Atom (system on chip)Joint (building)MetalDensity functional theoryMaterials scienceDimension (graph theory)CrystallographyChemistryComputational chemistryStructural engineeringMathematicsPure mathematicsMetallurgyPhysicsOpticsEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports on a combined spectroscopic and density functional theory study on a series of cyclo(diacetylenes-oligothiophenes) with different shapes and dimensions. The case of a macrocycle fragmented by the insertion of Pt metallic atoms is illustrated as well. The analysis covers the neutral and oxidized samples. A full assignment of the spectra has been proposed, supported by BP86/cc-pVDZ theoretical calculations. Ring shape and molecular dimension have been related with the C[Double Bond]CC-C structural parameters and Raman wave numbers. Platinum atom insertion within the acetylene spacer seems to soften ring strain owing to the rupture of the strained circular shape. Oxidation causes an overall downshift of the Raman wave numbers likely due to the skeletal relaxation of CC conjugated path, while the ring shape of each macrocycle is conserved upon oxidation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.569
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207