MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968065675 · doi:10.1093/notesj/gjq174

Genesis A, Line 1705b: Textual Problems and a Proposed Solution

2010· article· en· W1968065675 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNotes and Queries · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlliterationNothingReading (process)Line (geometry)PhilosophyLiteraturePoint (geometry)PoetryHistoryArtLinguisticsEpistemologyRhymeMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IN a 1916 article Henry Bradley proposed the emendation of Genesis A, line 1705, from þancolmod wer þeawum hydig to þancolmod wer Þare wæs haten.1 Understandably, his over-complicated suggestion for reconstruction has not received support, but the grounds for believing the line includes some textual error are sufficiently strong to merit further consideration of whether a better reading of line 1705b is not possible. First, this is the precise point at which we would expect the name Thare, father of Abraham (Genesis 11:26–7). Bradley argued that the poet ‘can have had no reason for leaving the patriarch anonymous’ and, more tellingly, the name is used twice, later in the poem as part of a patronymic for Abraham (eafora Þares: line 2054; Þares afera: line 2834), which perhaps implies that the author felt he had already explained who Þare was. Indeed, as Bradley pointed out, ‘the description þancolmod wer [in line 1705a], applied to a man about whom nothing whatever is known except his name and his place in the genealogy, decidedly looks as if it were introduced for the sake of alliteration with the name [Þare].’2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it