Medium-sized cyclophanes. Part 53.<sup>1</sup> Synthesis and conformational studies, and photoinduced cyclization of <i>syn</i>-[n.2]metacyclophanenes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of [n.2]metacyclophanenes (3) and (6) were prepared in good yields by a McMurry cyclization of 1,n-bis(3-acetyl-4-methoxyphenyl)alkanes (2) and 1,3-bis(3-formyl-4-methoxyphenyl)propane (5), respectively. Compounds 3b, 3c exist in the syn-conformation due to the steric repulsion between the methyl groups at the ethano bridge and the methoxy groups at the aromatic rings while compound 6 prefers the anti-conformation typical of [3.2]metacyclophanes. The assignment of syn-conformations has been confirmed by 1H NMR analyses and X-ray diffraction studies. Photoinduced transannular cyclization of [n.2]metacyclophanenes (3) and (6) in the presence of iodine as an oxidant afforded phenanthrene-anellated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Apparently, the rate of the photocyclization of anti-6 was found to be much faster than that of syn-3b and almost completed within 1 h. Thus, the different reactivities for the irradiation of syn- and anti-conformer were observed. The reason for the present preference for the formation of trans-dihydrophenanthrene rather than cis-dihydrophenanthrene as the intermediate might be attributable to the more stable chair form transition state than boat one and the conformational fixation to the chair form in the ground and transition state is possible in the anti-conformer.Key words: cyclophanes, strained molecule, McMurry reaction, CC coupling, conformation analysis, cyclizations, photolysis, transannular reactions, transition states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".