MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1968098382 · doi:10.1002/dac.1386

Ubiquitous computing for communications and broadcasting

2012· article· en· W1968098382 on OpenAlexaff
Jong Hyuk Park, Isaac Woungang, Jianhua Ma, Fahim Kawsar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Communication Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceUbiquitous computingBroadcasting (networking)Presentation (obstetrics)Focus (optics)Wireless sensor networkQuality (philosophy)Data scienceMultimediaTelecommunicationsHuman–computer interactionComputer securityComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ubiquitous computing (Ubi-Com) aims to cover the topics of seamless, secure, and intuitive access for distributed processing of various ubiquitous computing applications.Because the technology is evolving into the direction of wireless and the fast processing speed is also getting more attention, there have been many efforts to support the ubiquitous computing through distributed and parallel processing over the scattered networks.Specially, Ubiquitous Communication and Broadcasting are the core technologies for Ubi-Com.This special issue provides an international forum for the presentation and showcase of recent advances on various aspects of Ubiquitous Communication and Broadcasting (UCB).It will reflect the state-of-the-art of the computational methods, involving theory, algorithm, numerical simulation, error and uncertainty analysis and/or novel applications of new processing techniques in engineering, science, and other disciplines related to the UCB.The published papers are expected to focus on novel approaches for the UCB and to present high quality results for tackling problems arising from the ever-growing UCB.This special issue will serve as a landmark source for education, information, and reference to students, professionals, and researchers interested in updating their knowledge about or active in UCB models and services.We have received many manuscripts.Only seven manuscripts of high quality were finally selected for this special issue.Each manuscript selected was blindly reviewed by at least three reviewers consisting of guest editors and external reviewers.We present a brief overview of each manuscript in the following.The first paper entitled 'A sliding window-based false-negative approach for ubiquitous data stream analysis' by Younghee Kim et al. propose a method for a false-negative approach based on the Chernoff bound for efficient analysis of the data stream.Hence, we consider the problem of approximating frequency counts for space-efficient computation over data stream sliding windows.We show that a false-negative approach allowing a controlled number of frequent itemsets to be missing from the output is a more promising solution for mining frequent itemsets from a ubiquitous data stream.These are simple to implement, and have provable quality, space, and time guarantees.The experimental results have shown that the proposed algorithms achieve a high accuracy of at least 99% and require a small execution time.The second paper entitled 'A new query-by-humming system based on the score level fusion of two classifiers' by Gi Pyo Nam et al. propose a new method of query-by-humming (QBH) based on the score level fusion of two classifiers.This research is novel in the following three ways as compared with previous works.First, the features of the humming data are extracted by using musical note estimation based on the spectro-temporal autocorrelation.The extracted features are normalized by using the mean-shifting, median filtering, average filtering, and min-max scaling methods.Second, a pitch-based dynamic time warping method is used as the first classifier.The linear scaling method is used with the quantized binary (QB) code of the pitch data as the second classifier.Third,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Communication Systems→Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization→French-language works237,207→