MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968134894 · doi:10.1039/c1sm06429k

Retraction control of an impacted dielectric droplet through electrical pressure

2011· article· en· W1968134894 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSoft Matter · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDielectricSubstrate (aquarium)Corona dischargeVoltageCorona (planetary geology)Materials scienceDeposition (geology)Electric chargeElectric fieldChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Composite materialOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringChromatographyGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When a deposited dielectric liquid interface is exposed to a unipolar ion injection in a gaseous medium, the liquid expands over the grounded substrate due to the squeezing force of electric pressure (S. R. Mahmoudi, K. Adamiak, G. S. P. Castle, Spreading of a dielectric droplet through an interfacial electric pressure, Proc. R. Soc., 2011, 467, 3257–3271). A new active method based on the concept is proposed to control the deposition of an impacted dielectric droplet. An electric pressure resulting from the electric surface charge produced by corona discharge squeezes the droplet interface towards the grounded substrate and generates a resistance against the droplet retraction. It is demonstrated that the electrical pressure effectively suppresses the droplet retraction at voltages above the corona discharge threshold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it