MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968143570 · doi:10.1137/140968604

Mean First Passage Time for a Small Rotating Trap inside a Reflective Disk

2015· article· en· W1968143570 on OpenAlexaff
Justin C. Tzou, Théodore Kolokolnikov

Bibliographic record

VenueMultiscale Modeling and Simulation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiffusion and Search Dynamics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOmegaPhysicsBrownian motionRADIUSPath (computing)Trap (plumbing)Angular velocityBoundary (topology)CombinatoricsMathematical analysisMathematicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We compute the mean first passage time (MFPT) for a Brownian particle inside a two-dimensional disk with reflective boundaries and a small interior trap that is rotating at a constant angular velocity. The inherent symmetry of the problem allows for a detailed analytic study of the situation. For a given angular velocity, we determine the optimal radius of rotation that minimizes the average MFPT over the disk. Several distinct regimes are observed, depending on the ratio between the angular velocity $\omega$ and the trap size $\varepsilon$, and several intricate transitions are analyzed using the tools of asymptotic analysis and Fourier series. For $\omega\sim\mathcal{O}(1)$, we compute a critical value $\omega_c>0$ such that the optimal trap location is at the origin whenever $\omega<\omega_c$ and is off the origin for $\omega>\omega_c$. In the regime $1\ll\omega\ll\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-1})$ the optimal trap path approaches the boundary of the disk. However, as $\omega$ is further increased to $\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-1})$, the optimal trap path “jumps” closer to the origin. Finally, for $\omega\gg\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-1})$ the optimal trap path subdivides the disk into two regions of equal area. This simple geometry provides a good test case for future studies of MFPT with more complex trap motion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMultiscale Modeling and SimulationSame topicDiffusion and Search DynamicsFrench-language works237,207