MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968169176 · doi:10.1080/00102200802269707

Droplet Evaporation in a Turbulent Environment at Elevated Pressure and Temperature Conditions

2008· article· en· W1968169176 on OpenAlexaffabout
Madjid Birouk, M.M. Abou Al-Sood, İskender Gökalp

Bibliographic record

VenueCombustion Science and Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFreestreamTurbulenceThermodynamicsChemistryVaporizationHeat transferTurbulence kinetic energyEvaporationMass transferMechanicsMaterials scienceReynolds numberPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A three-dimensional numerical model is developed to assess the effect of freestream turbulence on the vaporization of n-heptane droplet, which is exposed to a freestream of nitrogen at elevated pressure and subcritical temperature conditions. The freestream pressure, temperature and turbulence intensity are varied in the range of 0.5–10 MPa, 324–502 K, and 0%–60%, respectively. Variable thermophysical properties, the unsteadiness behavior of the gas and liquid phases, as well as heat transfer by radiation are all considered. In addition, non-ideality behavior of the gas phase, solubility of the gas into the droplet and pressure dependence of the gas-phase thermophysical properties are also accounted for. The turbulence terms in the conservation equations of the gas-phase are modeled by using the shear-stress transport (SST) model. The results show that, for the temperature range (T∞ < Tc) explored in the present study, the droplet lifetime increases, and thereby the vaporization rate decreases, as pressure rises. However, the effect of pressure gradually diminishes as the ambient temperature increases and vanishes when T∞ approaches the critical temperature of n-heptane, Tc. Moreover, the effect of freestream turbulence intensity, which is found to enhance droplet heat and mass transfer, weakens as pressure increases. Finally, droplet turbulent heat and mass transfer correlations are proposed which account for all the aforementioned parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCombustion Science and TechnologySame topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207