MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968179503 · doi:10.1080/09687860601076522

Quantification of the effects of a ryanodine receptor channel mutation on interaction with a ryanoid

2007· article· en· W1968179503 on OpenAlexaff
Kishani M. Ranatunga, S. R. Wayne Chen, Luc Ruest, William H. Welch, Alan J. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Membrane Biology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of Calgary
FundersBritish Heart Foundation
KeywordsRyanodine receptorChemistryDissociation (chemistry)BiophysicsPoint mutationMutationMutantKineticsReceptorBiochemistryBiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the nature of the interaction of the plant alkaloid ryanodine with its receptor channel (RyR) is important to aid interpretation of physiological studies and provide structure-function information about RyR. We present here the first quantitative description of the relative single-channel kinetic effects of a single-point mutation in RyR2. We exploit the well-characterized ryanoid 8beta-amino-9alpha-hydroxyryanodine that displays reversible kinetics with RyR2. We explicitly show that the effect of the Q4863A mutation is to increase the apparent dissociation constant by increasing the apparent dissociation rate of the ryanoid. The voltage-dependence of the interaction displays no change. We infer that Q4863 is not involved with the voltage-drop but is able to influence ryanoid-bound structural changes. We discuss structural mechanisms by which this mutation could affect ryanoid interaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Membrane BiologySame topicPlant and Biological Electrophysiology StudiesFrench-language works237,207