MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968183215 · doi:10.1115/ipc2006-10115

Improvement in Compliance Reporting for Project Management at TransCanada

2006· article· en· W1968183215 on OpenAlexaff
Grace Corsino

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 1: Project Management; Design and Construction; Environmental Issues; GIS/Database Development; Innovative Projects and Emerging Issues; Operations and Maintenance; Pipelining in Northern Environments; Standards and Regulations · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDiverse Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsTransCanada (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompliance (psychology)AuditKey (lock)AccountingBusinessConformity assessmentProcess managementInternal auditRisk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceComputer securityOperations managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TransCanada PipeLines Limited operates under several provincial and federal regulatory authorities. As such, the company is required to submit to a range of compliance reporting. This paper will discuss the key commitment requirements that TransCanada faces and how the company is streamlining its business processes to facilitate timely and effective response. Furthermore, the paper will include a discussion on TransCanada’s proactive approach on adopting a unique “single method” on internal audits and 30 day compliance reporting that has saved time in the production of regulatory communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.041
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.064
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0410.064
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 1: Project Management; Design and Construction; Environmental Issues; GIS/Database Development; Innovative Projects and Emerging Issues; Operations and Maintenance; Pipelining in Northern Environments; Standards and RegulationsSame topicDiverse Research and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207