MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968190354 · doi:10.7202/600808ar

Le sort de la francophonie aux États-Unis

2009· article· fr· W1968190354 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Calvin Veltman

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers québécois de démographie · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les données tirées de l’Enquête sur le revenu et la scolarité, effectuée aux États-Unis en 1976, démontrent que les principales concentrations de groupes francophones se composent en majorité de personnes avancées en âge. Les données nous révèlent également des degrés élevés d’anglicisation, que celle-ci s’accompagne du maintien du français comme langue seconde ou d’un abandon du français. Par ailleurs, les ménages bilingues ne parviennent pas à transmettre la langue française aux jeunes. Dans le sud de la Nouvelle-Angleterre, les francophones ont toujours connu un taux élevé d’anglicisation. Dans le nord de la Nouvelle-Angleterre, les taux d’anglicisation sont plus faibles mais ils augmentent régulièrement. Le déclin est plus marqué en Louisiane où l’anglicisation des jeunes est déjà achevée et où il n’existe à peu près pas de bilingues de moins de vingt-cinq ans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers québécois de démographieSame topicLinguistics, Language Diversity, and IdentityFrench-language works237,207