Angiographic Coronary Spasm in a Case of Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Mimicking Acute Myocardial Infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neurologic stunned myocardium after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has been evidenced. Clinical presentations manifested as ST segment elevation by electrocardiography (ECG), left ventricular wall motion abnormality by echocardiography, and abnormal cardiac markers. The pathophysiology remains controversial. Coronary artery spasm has been proposed as a possible mechanism. However, most SAH patients with ECG and echocardiographic findings suggestive of myocardial infarction were lacking of angiographic evidence of vasospasm. We present a case of 66-year-old man complained chest pain with transient conscious loss on the street. He was sent to our emergency room by witness with clear consciousness and electrocardiography showing prominent ST-segment elevation. Because chest tightness was complained, emergent catheterization was arranged immediately. Coronary angiography demonstrated a narrowing lesion on mid right coronary artery without atherosclerotic change on other site. He was successfully treated with primary coronary balloon angioplasty for the narrowing lesion. Then the patient was sent to intensive care unit for further care. His following ECG demonstrated sinus rhythm with ectopic beats without ST segment elevation. Unfortunately, he became irritable and deterioration of conscious level few hour later. Computer tomography revealed subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Conservative treatment was suggested by neurological surgeon consulted. The clinical presentation of the SAH patient mimicked acute myocardial infarction and coronary spasm was evidenced by angiography. We report the case and review the articles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".