MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968233103 · doi:10.1558/pomh.v2i1.25

Music, poetry, and the politics of identity in Réunion Island

2007· article· en· W1968233103 on OpenAlex
Guillaume Samson, Shawn Pitre

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePopular Music History · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMusicalPoetryPoliticsMulticulturalismIdentity (music)ColonialismFolkloreNegotiationAutonomyLiteratureHistoryAestheticsArtSociologyPolitical scienceSocial scienceLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article describes the ways language, poetry and musical creation had been used, in Réunion Island, to negotiate identity in colonial and post-colonial contexts. Focusing on three main currents since the end of the eighteenth century, it examines in detail the semantic role of literary and musical choices in a multicultural society. It shows in particular how political struggle for autonomy or French belonging had conditioned, in the seventies, the creation of a musical and literary dichotomy between 'folklore' and 'tradition'. The article analyses various recordings from 1930 to 1980, establishing boundaries for the study of the recording industry of the island.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it