MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968233557 · doi:10.1115/1.4028637

Synthesis of RCCC Linkages to Visit Four Given Poses

2014· article· en· W1968233557 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mechanisms and Robotics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevolute jointDyadKinematicsTopology (electrical circuits)InfinityComputer scienceBar (unit)MathematicsAsymmetryGeometryMathematical analysisCombinatoricsPhysicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on the problem of synthesis of spatial four-bar linkages of the RCCC type for rigid-body guidance with four given poses, R denoting a revolute, C a cylindrical kinematic pair. While synthesis equations for CC and RC dyads are available in the literature, the synthesis of spatial RCCC four-bar linkages requires special attention, due to its asymmetric topology. We revisit the problem to cope robustly with the asymmetry, namely, the approximate nature of the RC dyad and the infinity of exact solutions of the CC dyad for the number of given poses. Our approach includes a robust formulation of the synthesis of CC dyads, for the determination of axis-congruences. Moreover, we formulate a uniform synthesis equation, which enables us to treat both RC and CC dyads, with properly selected constraints for both cases. Two design examples are included.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it