MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968284716 · doi:10.7202/017482ar

Réexamen du parcours narratif : place et types de la sanction

2008· article· fr· W1968284716 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hamid Reza Shaïri

Bibliographic record

VenueProtée · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSemiotics and Representation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Par leurs diversités culturelles, les discours sont souvent le moyen de fournir à la théorie une force innovante. Le petit conte persan auquel nous nous intéressons ici nécessite une révision du régime narratif classique puisque le modèle standard de la narrativité semble insuffisant pour son examen. En effet, cette étude s’efforce de montrer comment le discours persan nous met en présence d’un parcours qui, nourri de la problématique de la tensivité et du corps, déplace les phases du schéma narratif en le faisant débuter par une sanction anticipée et manipulatoire. Nous verrons par la même occasion en quoi cette sanction procure à la narrativité une dimension sensible et phénoménologique. Cela nous permettra de constater que l’interaction des plans sémiotiques aboutit à l’insertion des dimensions axiologiques – impressive, émotionnelle et cognitive – dans le parcours narratif pour créer deux formes de vies distinctes : commencer par la fin ; finir par le commencement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProtéeSame topicSemiotics and Representation StudiesFrench-language works237,207