A NOVEL DISTANCE FUNCTION: FREQUENCY DIFFERENCE METRIC
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A high quality distance function that measures the difference between instances is essential in many real-world applications and research fields. For example, in instance-based learning, the distance function plays the most important role. A large number of distance functions have been proposed. For nominal attributes, Value Difference Metric (VDM) is one of the state-of-the-art and widely used distance functions. However, it needs to estimate the conditional probabilities, which drops its efficiency in computing the distance between instances. Besides, a practical issue that arises in estimating the conditional probabilities is that the denominators can be zero or very small. This makes them either undefined or very large. Therefore, an efficient distance function that can measure the difference between two instances but without the practical issue confronting VDM is desirable. In this paper, we propose a novel distance function: Frequency Difference Metric (FDM). FDM is just based on the joint frequencies of class labels and attribute values, instead of the conditional probabilities. Extensive empirical studies show that FDM performs almost as well as VDM in terms of accuracy, but significantly outperforms VDM in terms of efficiency. This work provides a very simple, efficient, and effective distance function that can be widely used in many real-world applications and research fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it