MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968371579 · doi:10.1121/1.4777279

Harp design and construction

2005· article· en· W1968371579 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Waltham

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic Technology and Sound Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHARPContext (archaeology)AcousticsSound (geography)Tension (geology)Tone (literature)Computer scienceRange (aeronautics)Mechanical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringAerospace engineeringArtHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The harp is an instrument with a set of plucked strings connected directly to the sound board. Thus the requirement that the sound board be very light for efficient radiation is pitted against the requirement that the strings be tight enough to maintain harmonicity. These factors have determined the evolution of the harp since Sumerian times. As materials and construction methods have improved, strings have become tighter and sound boards lighter. Large harps have total tensions in the range of ten kilonewtons. The material of choice for the sound board, usually spruce, is pushed to the limits of its strength, and even professionally built concert harps tend not to last more than a few decades. The strings themselves are made from a variety of materials, wrapped or plain, to balance the physical requirements of tension and feel, with the acoustical demands of harmonicity and tone. Historical materials such as copper and silk have given way to steel and nylon, although gut still has a niche in the mid-range of a concert harp. These physics and engineering issues will be considered in the context of practical harp construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicMusic Technology and Sound StudiesFrench-language works237,207