MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968372785 · doi:10.1134/s1028334x10020108

Main regularities of the Late Pleistocene-Holocene transgression of the Black Sea

2010· article· en· W1968372785 on OpenAlexaff
N. V. Yesin, Valentina Yanko‐Hombach, O. N. Kukleva, Nikolay Esin

Bibliographic record

VenueDoklady Earth Sciences · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and environmental studies
Canadian institutionsAvalon Rare Metals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarine transgressionHolocenePleistoceneGeologyBlack seaSea levelOceanographyRange (aeronautics)Sea level changeQuaternaryPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mathematical model describing the Black Sea level change in the Late Pleistocene-Holocene is offered. A theoretical curve for temporal change in the sea level is obtained. It is established that, in the range from 20 to 12 ky BP, the sea level rose to ∼20 m and fluctuated with various amplitudes and periods. In the range from 12 to 11 ky BP during the Bosphorus Strait formation, there was a sea regression by 30–50 meters, and level of the Black Sea dropped to the World Ocean level. Further, it mirrored variation of the ocean level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDoklady Earth SciencesSame topicMarine and environmental studiesFrench-language works237,207