Intact<i>Cryptosporidium parvum</i>oocysts isolated after in vitro excystation are infectious to neonatal mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In vitro excystation is often used as a measure of viability of encysted protozoan parasites. Parasites that do not excyst in vitro are assumed to be non-viable and non-infectious, whereas those that do excyst are assumed viable. To test the validity of these assumptions, Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts were excysted in vitro using two different excystation protocols, and the non-excysted intact oocysts were isolated using flow cytometry. Non-excysted sorted oocysts readily infected neonatal CD-1 mice. Increasing the duration of the excystation assays from 1 h to 3 h resulted in a higher percent of excysted oocysts, but the remaining non-excysted parasites were still capable of infecting neonatal CD-1 mice. Our results suggest that in vitro excystation is not an accurate measure of the viability or infectious potential of C. parvum oocysts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".