MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968409070 · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0835-8

A Twenty-First Century Assessment of Values Across the Global Workforce

2011· article· en· W1968409070 on OpenAlexaff
David A. Ralston, Carolyn P. Egri, Emmanuelle Reynaud, S. Narasimhan, Olivier Furrer, David Brock, Ruth Alas, Florian von Wangenheim, Fidel León Darder, Christine Kuo, Vojko Potočan, Audra I. Mockaitis, Erna Szabo, Jaime Ruiz-Gutiérrez, Andre Pekerti, Arif Nazir Butt, Ian Palmer, Irina Naoumova, Tomasz Lenartowicz, Arūnas Starkus, Vu Thanh Hung, Tevfik Dalgić, Mario Marco Molteni, María Teresa de la Garza Carranza, Isabelle Maignan, Francisco Castro, Yong-Lin Moon, Jane Terpstra-Tong, Marina Dabić, Yongjuan Li, Wade Danis, Maria Kangasniemi, Mahfooz A. Ansari, Liesl Riddle, Laurie P. Milton, Philip Hallinger, Detelin Elenkov, Ilya Girson, Modesta Gelbuda, Prem Ramburuth, Tânia Casado, Ana Maria Rossi, Malika Richards, Cheryl Van Deusen, Ping-Ping Fu, Paulina Wan, Moureen Tang, Chay-Hoon Lee, Ho-Beng Chia, Yongquin Fan, Alan Wallace

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Business Ethics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCultural Differences and Values
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of LethbridgeSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness ethicsQuality of Life ResearchWorkforcePolitical sciencePublic healthPublic relationsLawMedicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.012
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.247
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations158
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Business EthicsSame topicCultural Differences and ValuesFrench-language works237,207