MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968414672 · doi:10.1109/icc.2007.166

Non-Orthogonal Transmission and Noncoherent Fusion of Censored Decisions

2007· article· en· W1968414672 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFusion centerRayleigh fadingComputer scienceBandwidth (computing)Fusion rulesWireless sensor networkTransmission (telecommunications)FusionAlgorithmEfficient energy useEnergy (signal processing)Sensor fusionElectronic engineeringFadingReal-time computingWirelessTelecommunicationsMathematicsCognitive radioComputer networkEngineeringArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel signaling scheme and corresponding noncoherent fusion rules for wireless sensor networks. In the proposed scheme, sensors transmit censored decisions to the fusion center using signature vectors. To improve bandwidth efficiency the signature vector length can be chosen smaller than the number of sensors in the network resulting in non-orthogonal sensor channels. We derive the optimum noncoherent likelihood-ratio (LR) based fusion rule as well as a low-complexity energy-based fusion rule for the considered signaling scheme and Rayleigh fading. Furthermore, the performance of the energy-based fusion rule is analyzed. Numerical and simulation results show that with the proposed scheme significant improvements in bandwidth efficiency are possible at the expense of a small loss in power efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it