Deep maxout neural networks for speech recognition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A recently introduced type of neural network called maxout has worked well in many domains. In this paper, we propose to apply maxout for acoustic models in speech recognition. The maxout neuron picks the maximum value within a group of linear pieces as its activation. This nonlinearity is a generalization to the rectified nonlinearity and has the ability to approximate any form of activation functions. We apply maxout networks to the Switchboard phone-call transcription task and evaluate the performances under both a 24-hour low-resource condition and a 300-hour core condition. Experimental results demonstrate that maxout networks converge faster, generalize better and are easier to optimize than rectified linear networks and sigmoid networks. Furthermore, experiments show that maxout networks reduce underfitting and are able to achieve good results without dropout training. Under both conditions, maxout networks yield relative improvements of 1.1-5.1% over rectified linear networks and 2.6-14.5% over sigmoid networks on benchmark test sets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it