MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Economics of Controlling Infectious Diseases on Dairy Farms

2002· article· en· W1968447597 on OpenAlex
Junwook Chi, Alfons Weersink, John VanLeeuwen, G.P. Keefe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMycobacterium research and diagnosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward IslandUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultural scienceLimitingDisease controlHerdDisease preventionProfitability indexLivestockVaccinationBiologyBusinessBiotechnologyMedicineVeterinary medicineGeographyEnvironmental healthForestryEngineeringVirologyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cost‐effective disease control on the dairy farm can enhance productivity and subsequently profitability. Previous economic studies on animal disease have focused on production losses and evaluation of disease eradication programs and have provided little guidance on the optimal prevention action. This paper presents a theoretical model on the economics of livestock disease and develops an empirical model to determine the optimal set of control strategies for four production‐limiting cattle diseases: bovine viral diarrhea (BVD), enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL), Johne's Disease (JD) and neosporosis. Control functions indicating the prevalence of infection with each of the four diseases for each of the 10 strategies are estimated. The optimal strategies that minimize total disease cost (direct production losses and control expenditures) are provided for each disease on the basis of farm survey results from the maritime provinces. The results emphasize the importance of introduction checks before new animals enter the herd and adequate vaccination protection as cost‐effective control strategies. Lutter contre la maladie d'une manière rentable dans les élevages de bovins laitiers peut déboucher sur un meilleur rendement et des profits plus élevés. Les études économiques antérieures s'intéressant à cet aspect portaient essentiellement sur les pertes de production et l'évaluation des programmes d'éradication. Elles donnaient peu d'indications sur la solution idéale au niveau de la prévention. Cet article présente un modèle théorique de l'économique des maladies du bétail et aboutit à un modèle empirique permettant d'établir le jeu optimal de moyens pour lutter contre quatre maladies réduisant la production animale : la diarrhée à virus des bovins (DVB), la leucose bovine enzootique (LBE), la paratuberculose et la néosporose. Les auteurs estiment les fonctions qui indiquent la prévalence d'une infection pour chacune des quatre maladies retenues, dans le cadre des dix stratégies examinées. Ensuite, ils présentent les meilleures stratégies, à savoir celles qui minimisent le coût total de la maladie (pertes de production directes et dépenses associées à la lutte contre la maladie), pour chaque maladie en fonction des résultats d'un sondage auprès des éleveurs des provinces de l'Atlantique. Tout indique que les méthodes de lutte les plus rentables sont l'examen de l'animal avant son addition au troupeau et une vaccination qui protègera les bêtes de manière adéquate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it