Droit, contexte et changement social dans la théorie des systèmes sociaux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
I. Serait-ce pour paradoxalement nous inviter à la modestie que les responsables de la présente revue nous ont immédiatement projetés, par leur question inaugurale, dans le puissant imaginaire de la métaphore fluviale ?Le fleuve, symbole de vie et de mort, le fleuve divinisé par l'ensemble des civilisations antiques, dieu généreux, indomptable, parfois cruel, que l'on craint autant qu'on le vénère car il purifie et n'oublie rien, fleuve, enfin, qui donnait son nom aux territoires qu'il traverse 1 .Prise au pied de la lettre, cette métaphore pourrait nous suggérer tous les excès, excès contre lesquels, dans cette revue et il y a déjà plus de trente ans, Jacques Commaille mettait en garde l'apprenti sociologue du droit voulant saisir l'articulation entre le droit et le changement social 2 .En tant que juriste, la sociologie constituera pourtant la discipline faîtière à partir de laquelle je tâcherai de répondre à la question posée 3 .Parmi les 1 Voy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.030 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".