MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968466607 · doi:10.7202/1027664ar

Observatoire d’oiseaux du Parc national du Bic : 12 ans de suivi printanier des oiseaux de proie migrateurs

2014· article· fr· W1968466607 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Jean-Sébastien Guénette, Yong Lang

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Naturaliste canadien · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du QuébecRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
FundersEnvironment Canada
KeywordsHumanitiesArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le belvédère Raoul-Roy, situé dans le Parc national du Bic, est l’un des meilleurs sites au Québec pour observer la migration des oiseaux de proie. Un programme de suivi a été mis en place en 2002 et a notamment pour objectif de caractériser l’abondance et la richesse des oiseaux de proie passant au sud de l’estuaire du fleuve Saint-Laurent, et, par ricochet, l’évolution temporelle du passage printanier de chacune des espèces. Le programme vise aussi à déterminer les conditions favorables à leur migration. Jusqu’à maintenant, 17 espèces d’oiseaux de proie ont été recensées, les plus abondantes étant la buse à queue rousse (Buteo jamaicensis) et l’épervier brun (Accipiter striatus). Le programme a permis aussi de documenter l’augmentation des passages de certaines espèces, dont l’urubu à tête rouge (Cathartes aura), le pygargue à tête blanche (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), l’aigle royal (Aquila chrysaetos) et le faucon pèlerin (Falco peregrinus). Une meilleure connaissance de la migration printanière des oiseaux de proie aidera à leur conservation, notamment au processus d’évaluation environnementale de futurs projets de développement d’énergie éolienne dans l’est du Québec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe Naturaliste canadienSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207