MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968467714 · doi:10.2118/167789-ms

New Models for Reserve Estimation and Non-Darcy Gas Flow in Shale Gas Reservoirs

2014· article· en· W1968467714 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesShell Canada
KeywordsPermeability (electromagnetism)Darcy's lawPetroleum engineeringSlippageKerogenSaturation (graph theory)Real gasRelative permeabilityVolume (thermodynamics)ChemistryPorous mediumAdsorptionMechanicsThermodynamicsPorosityGeologyMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringPhysicsSource rock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Organic-rich shale gas reservoirs have various complexities related to the physics of gas storage and transport. Traditionally, the OGIP in shales has been calculated as the sum of the adsorbed gas and the free gas, using CBM reservoirs as an analog. However, as recently noted in the literature, the free gas volume must be corrected for presence of adsorbed gas, assuming all gas storage occurs in kerogen. Even with these corrections in place, shales are still complex reservoirs in terms of flow characteristics. The contribution of viscous, diffusive, and slip forces in nano-scale conduits cause the permeability calculated from Darcy's Law to be higher than the value for liquids. A new model is developed to address the effect of the adsorbed gas volume on the nanopore storage capacity. The relative fraction of adsorbed gas volume is treated as a sorbed-phase saturation. The initial free gas volume is then calculated by subtracting any non-free gas saturation from the effective void volume. We have extended this concept to a gas material balance equation through which the free gas volume is dynamically adjusted during depletion. The Simplified Local Density (SLD) adsorption model is used to evaluate sorbed-phase density and volume. To address the complexity in gas flow, permeability of the reservoir model is assumed to be a function of pressure in order to determine the impact of advection, slippage and diffusion mechanisms. The permeability is calculated via a multi-mechanism flow model. Finally, we utilized the dynamically-corrected permeability in parallel with dynamically-corrected porosity to simulate the primary recovery of a shale gas reservoir. The new models successfully describe the unique characteristics of shale reservoirs and correct the conventional methods for overestimation of reserves and underestimation of permeability. The format of the final material balance equation and flow model used here preserves the conventional reservoir engineering framework, but with some important modifications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.431
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it