MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968470436 · doi:10.3751/63.1.11

The <i>Arab Street</i> : Tracking a Political Metaphor

2009· article· en· W1968470436 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Middle East Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetaphorPoliticsPolitical sciencePolitical economySociologyLawPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding Arab public opinion is central to the search for sustainable political solutions in the Middle East.The way Westerners think about Arab public opinion may be affected by how it is referred to in their news media.Here, we show that Arab public opinion is rarely referred to as such in the US media.Instead, it is usually referred to as the Arab street, a metaphor that casts Arab public opinion as irrational and volatile.We trace the origins of this metaphor to similar expressions in both English and Arabic, and note similarities and important differences between the English and Arabic usages.Ultimately, we argue that the Arab street metaphor misrepresents the Arab public, and invites dismissal of rather than engagement with Arab public opinion.Arab public opinion helps shape the modern Middle East, whether through the ballot box, support for armed resistance, or otherwise.Regardless of one's political stance, Arab public opinion is inescapably important, and one would be unwise to dismiss or mischaracterize it.Yet current usage in the US media invites readers to do just that by regularly referring to Arab public opinion metaphorically as the Arab street.we will argue that this metaphor constructs Arab public opinion in a stereotypical, inaccurate, and pejorative fashion.Thus, the widespread use of this metaphor has the potential to obscure the actual nature of public opinion in the Arab world, 1 and to impede engagement with it.This metaphor has received some analytical attention, 2 but despite its centrality in the US media, to our knowledge no comprehensive study of its use and origins has yet been conducted.Here, we present the results of such a study, based primarily on the archives of English and Arabic newspapers over the past several decades.we sought to answer three questions:1. Is the Arab street an innocuous metaphor for Arab public opinion, or does it invite a negatively framed and inaccurate stance toward that public?2. Is this metaphor used frequently enough that it might have an appreciable effect

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it