The Role of Growth Factors on Acceleration of Bone Regeneration During Distraction Osteogenesis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The distraction osteogenesis (DO) technique has been used worldwide to treat many complex orthopedic and craniofacial conditions. One limitation of this technique is the long time of fixator needs to be left in place until the bone is completely consolidated. Various biophysical, mechanical, and biological methods have been investigated to accelerate bone regeneration during DO. Several growth factors (GFs) are known to enhance bone regeneration such as bone morphogenic proteins, transforming growth factor beta, fibroblast growth factor, insulin growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor. These GFs are known to stimulate cellular growth, proliferation, migration, and differentiation. In this review, an extensive overview of these GFs development and applications on acceleration of bone regeneration in the context of DO is discussed. Current challenges and alternative tissue engineering techniques to address the delivery and sustain release of these factors are also discussed. Finally, we highlighted our view regarding the remaining questions and future research directions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it